Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 9-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156 |
Dimir Bounce | __bmj__ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Midrange | beno04 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Esper Pixie | pepeteam | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Bounce | txepi | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
5 Color Legends , Azorius Control , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Cauldron , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Descend , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash
Restless Reef ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Restless Reef is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 30.46 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Restless Reef has a win rate of 69.1%, making it 0.2% better than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 32 | 75.5% | 11 |
Urborg Scavengers | Creature — Spirit | 5 | 66.1% | 2 |
Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 31 | 65.5% | 5 |
Sorcerous Spyglass | Artifact | 8 | 65.0% | 3 |
Bring the Ending | Instant | 6 | 63.5% | 4 |
Quick Study | Instant | 28 | 62.4% | 8 |
Ephara's Dispersal | Instant | 6 | 61.9% | 2 |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 73 | 61.8% | 14 |
Spiteful Hexmage | Creature — Human Warlock | 70 | 61.6% | 15 |
Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 141 | 61.5% | 57 |
Cards that perform better with Restless Reef than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 7 | 75.9% | 68.4% | +7.5% |
Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 5 | 13 | 73.1% | 67.2% | +5.9% |
Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 73.9% | 68.9% | +5.0% |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 5 | 71.4% | 66.6% | +4.8% |
Pest Control | Sorcery | 2 | 11 | 71.7% | 67.6% | +4.0% |
Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 2 | 18 | 76.7% | 72.9% | +3.8% |
Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 70 | 72.2% | 68.7% | +3.5% |
Get Out | Instant | 2 | 39 | 74.4% | 71.2% | +3.2% |
Doomsday Excruciator | Creature — Demon | 6 | 5 | 75.0% | 72.1% | +2.9% |
Grim Bauble | Artifact | 1 | 59 | 71.2% | 68.4% | +2.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | 2018 | 97.9% | 50.2% |
Dimir Bounce | 481 | 98.0% | 49.7% |
Esper Pixie | 279 | 18.0% | 55.3% |
Dimir Demons | 100 | 98.0% | 51.1% |
Dimir Control | 73 | 100.0% | 53.3% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.